Any candidate would like the recruitment process to be as impartial as possible, but as Alexander Pope once said: to err is human. And recruiters are no exception to that rule.
Here is what a Forbes article entitled “Data-Driven HR: How Big Data And Analytics Are Transforming Recruitment” has to say on the subject: “many HR professionals or hiring managers would probably admit that they make appointments based on gut feeling.”
Disheartening though it may sound, the good news is that data and analytics are helping employers take the guesswork out of recruitment.
Not only that, but also the rise of people-first approach in recruitment makes the job search experience increasingly candidate-friendly. Here is a short summary of two valuable articles on the subject:
Based on our own observations of the last 12 months, we see that:
- mid-level managers are also offered individual outplacement
- more and more modern / online tools are being used due to technology advancement
- the employees’ awareness is greater: instead of being ashamed of being laid-off, they actively ask for support in navigating the job market
- there’s an increase in the number of employers who tell their employees: “We have a budget of XX, you can choose the service provider yourself”. Sometimes the employer imposes a number of for example 3 companies which fulfill certain requirements. In such situation it is the employee who contacts different companies, has “casting” meetings and then returns with their own choice.
Companies can be assisted by a specialized freelancer, a boutique, a local or international company. There are also companies for which outplacement services are only a small portion of their turnover, as they normally focus on recruitment or HR consulting.
The price and quality of outplacement services depends on many different factors, not only on the company type. To choose a service provider that fulfills all requirements of the firm, it is best to answer the following questions that will then constitute criteria of evaluation:
In principle, there are 2 types of outplacement:
- group outplacement for homogeneous groups of employees, e.g.: working in the same department or on similar positions; consists of group workshops on e.g.: navigating the job market, preparing professional application documents, interview preparation
- individual outplacement which consists of individual consultations in above mentioned areas
There is also a “mixed” version: after group workshops, employees would have access to individual consultations. There is a variety of options.
Many employers who face the challenge of personnel reduction ask themselves: what should I do to carry out the whole process with the least negative outcome?
According to a survey conducted by Reed Consulting:
- 78% of respondents claimed that outplacement can contribute to improving a company’s image
- 55% said that offering outplacement services can help a company to be perceived by their potential new employees as an attractive employer
Despite the will to help their employees, organizations which decide to provide outplacement services also want to:
There are various reasons why organizations decide to make their employees redundant:
- change in business strategy and resulting reduction of positions that are no longer necessary
- closing a branch office / offices
- merger or acquisition
- employees’ underperformance
According to the “Right Management” report (Manpower Group), 81% of European organizations who took part in the research said that one of the many criteria of a decision to offer employees outplacement services was the will to help them find new professional opportunities. It might seem that the only situation when outplacement services are not offered is when employees are made redundant because of their underpeformance. However, sometimes even then support is offered, provided that the employee worked at the company for a long time.
Challenges for the Board and HR Department:
Leaving your job? Or just thinking of leaving your job? If your answer to one of these questions is “yes” you might want to think about how to deal with the stress and all the other byproducts of the whole process.
This topic is covered by the last (but not least) video of the LinkedIn Learning video series concerning career & job search. Here’s a sneak peek of the content:
- “before”: leaving any job is an emotional experience that can be a little unsettling. How will you deal with the whole range of emotions you’ll experience then? One of the ideas is to come up with a list of pros and cons of leaving so that you can choose what’s truly best for you. And once you make that decision, don’t let yourself fall into a downward spiral of “what if’s” Read more
In the previous post of this series we wrote about one of the job hunting related courses offered by LinkedIn Learning called “Managing your Career” which covers the basics of starting a job search. Now it’s time to figure out a strategy.
The brilliantly concise video “Job Search Strategies” offers a comprehensive guide to topics ranging from online tools to manage the job search, your online presence and searching for a job on the Internet over to networking and headhunters.
Key highlights of this 40-minute course:
Everything is possible irrespectively of the length of the career break, but there’s a strategy and methodology to getting back into the active workforce.
Career reentry expert Carol Fishman Cohen shares her own and her clients’ journey like “You are going to have a lot of conversations that don’t go anywhere. Expect that, and don’t be discouraged by it. There will be a handful that ultimately lead to a job opportunity.”
Carol also discusses the two main concerns employers have concerns so-called “relaunchers”:
1) That they are technologically obsolete
Once in a while we come across pearls in the form of valuable articles that we share with pleasure. This one was written by AltoPartners and is called “The Pathway to Executive Leadership”.
Although it refers to examples from Australia and the mining industry it is relevant for all managers who consciously (want to) manage their careers and are ready to honestly look at themselves.
It talks about 3 types of candidates and their inherent risks – from an Executive Search Consultant’s perspective:
- those who have a proven leadership track record in a specific domain
- those who have a proven leadership track record in a transferable domain
- those who have proven themselves in a functional management role, and are ready for the next step.